| Comment | this misrepresents the situation as much as it did last time it came up
two restaurants can, and do, have the same name without any issues. The issue is that both brands are looking to expand and franchise, so have competing IP, and so need legal resolution. I'm not sure what friendly resolution there is to work out here, one of them has to rebrand, and neither wants it to be them.
Sugo Manchester is opening a huge new restaurant with shitloads of venture capital, so don't fall for the little family restaurant instagram let's just be friends thing, that's just as much corporate PR as Paesano does. |
|---|