| Comment | The majority of what you've listed there took place with Rusbridger as editor-in-chief, or in the case of expenses was predominantly the Telegraph's work. My point, as I made to them when I cancelled my subscription after two or three years under Viner, is that a lot of what they're running with now from an editorial and op-ed perspective is very divisive, and the sub editors are fucking terrible for writing click-bait headlines that bear little to no relationship to articles. |
|---|