| Comment | I'm not going to disagree the clickbait stuff exists, but every paper has to do that now - it's there to bring in the ad revenue that pays for the decent stuff, it's not instead of it. Bottom line is that the paper was haemorrhaging money before Viner, and I think she's been pretty open about this.
I don't at all get what you mean by the 'divisive' bit though, most of it has nothing to do with UK politics (or any politics) and meant for US clickthrough volumes, it's just your standard 'animal pictures of the day' and stolen twitter lightweight stuff.
Is this an Owen Jones thing? |
|---|