| Comment | >By definition they're under-priced, because demand exceeds capacity at the current price.
Fine, if you want to get all semantic about it you may technically be correct. But do you really want people to have to pay more for trains? Abellio are keeping profits, instead of investing in sufficient rolling stock, not hiding train carriages. This isn't London, we don't have anything like the same density and are doing things differently here already. I'm not suggesting night shifts, just stating that flexitime and working from home can and should be more prevalent. Do you really, really think trains should be more expensive? |
|---|