| Comment | how many did they send a few weeks back to get one guy who was stomping round a river?
The point is that the paper is claiming a 'riot' happened with absolutely no evidence of that. They have no witness, no official quote saying that or anyone except themselves describing it as a riot. They could have quoted 'large scale disturbance' and been accurate and truthful according to the information they have. They chose not to. They chose to claim a 'riot' happened with absolutely no evidence. |
|---|