Comment | You're 'agreeing to disagree' without refuting any counterpoints presented to you.
ComicalAli states: 'Celtic FC did shield pedos'.
You extrapolate a strawman from that along the lines of 'Celtic FC did shield pedos and Celtic fans support the protection of paedophiles which is a ridiculous position to take.'
The 'position' isn't clear from a five-word sentence.
No offence, but if you want to have a discussion about politics or football or child abuse, then don't use faulty logic and bow out when someone calls you on it. |
---|