| Comment | I think it's above our pay grades to determine why the WHO retracted their statement, but I think it would be fairer to state at best that opinion is divided, if not just inconclusive, as the WHO stated, meaning it's safer to assume it can be transmitted. Launching insults and providing unprovable opinion is not an argument.
I can provide evidence of the Royal Society recommending mask wearing, but conveniently again your argument has no backing.
Again this is not true, The guidance is that masks are to be worn on public transport, and in enclosed spaces. Why do you think this is if masks have no use ?
So in summary, we should trust your opinion over the stated opinion of the WHO (because you're so clever and have more than half a brain).
The Royal Society is not to be trusted, but you can't detail a body who should, so should again we rely on your opinion.
We should also disregard government recomendations, because you know better.
I think I'll stick with the WHO, the Royal Society and the Government, rather than some random guy of the internet. |
|---|