| Comment | I do know the difference, I just wanted to explore where to draw the line. But ideally no one would *need* to live in any one particular rental property. If there was abundant social/state housing and private landlords provided services only outside of that, say in the luxury market, would that be morally acceptable.
FYI I do believe in strong regulation of services such as housing, but I personally never completely rule out the private trading of almost anything. There will always be someone needs something that a centralised service can't or doesn't provide.
Also had to look up interlocutor, new one for me thanks! |
|---|