| Comment | I dont quite understand what you mean. Both taking away and eating in helps keep restaurants in buisness, if anything taking away is probably better for them as there is no limit to how many take aways they can sell while there is a limit to how many people they can host on their premises.
As for your theory on how they could scam the government, they could claim fake 'dining in' meals the same way they could claim fake takeaway meals, there's no verification for either.
I'd say the most likely reason they introduced the scheme with the 'dine in' only restriction was to encourage people to get more comfortable spending money in indoor areas in general, so that there's an boom in spending when highstreet shops re-open. |
|---|