| Comment | > Ah so you're saying a person can be HIV+ and not resemble any of the stereotypical qualities of a 'junkie'? In other words they could look fairly normal and respectable?
Of course. That's why I said it would apply to people with track marks...
> That would render the sign pretty redundant, ineffective and mean-spirited, no?
No. But I can understand why the sign would seem pointless if you were the type of person that thinks only homeless people that can't afford ink are junkies. |
|---|