r/Glasgow Tools

Title
Author	ndop
Comment	So it's a fact according to you that she could face legal consequences based on this post alone? That's a fact? Even in being captain autistic letter of the law only and ignoring reality it's still debatable and in the actual real world it's not a debate at all as anyone with a functioning brain would know there's zero chance this is treated as anything but a silly joke. The rest is just more silly argumentative tactics as you seem to like to do. Calling me names is still just pointless name calling no matter how formal the language you use to do it is - no better than the shit you accuse me of just a bit less swear-y. Shouting "fact" a lot does not make you more right. Do you want me to say "you're wrong because you're a cunt" or something like that so you can shout ad-hominem at me and feel like you "won" because you found a fallacy? Whatever will make you fuck off as it's pretty clear you don't actually want to argue the point or you would have kept doing it several posts ago instead of descending into "can't admit I might not have been 100% right" cheap argumentative bullshit which is all you're doing now. Even if I'm abusing and insulting and a right fucking twat I'm not wrong mate. Your "clear evidence to the contrary" is anything but and you're absolutely delusional if you think you've provided clear evidence she is at legal risk based on this post alone. Mate, it's fine to just admit you were being overly rigid and it's very fucking clear that in the real world the obvious joke nature of this post would be the first thing considered and first reason why it would never make it as far as legal trouble. If you genuinely can't see even some truth in that then I think you need to get your programming checked as it's not factoring in some important things. I suspect you can actually see that side of my argument though which is why you keep avoiding actually arguing that point and evade to whatever other nonsense instead. As I'm sure you'll do in your next reply again. I wonder what argumentative tactic can't ever lose an argument online bullshit you'll hit out with next. Actually I don't, I hope you won't bother.
Reddit Link	https://www.reddit.com/r/glasgow/comments/j9m6f3/no_sorry_i_will_not_be_buying_your_20_mystery_box/g8m2c8i/
Created	Mon 12th Oct 2020 7:01pm
Status	normal ()

So it's a fact according to you that she could face legal consequences based on this post alone? That's a fact? Even in being captain autistic letter of the law only and ignoring reality it's *still* debatable and in the actual real world it's not a debate at all as anyone with a functioning brain would know there's zero chance this is treated as anything but a silly joke.

The rest is just more silly argumentative tactics as you seem to like to do. Calling me names is still just pointless name calling no matter how formal the language you use to do it is - no better than the shit you accuse me of just a bit less swear-y. Shouting "fact" a lot does not make you more right.

Do you want me to say "you're wrong because you're a cunt" or something like that so you can shout ad-hominem at me and feel like you "won" because you found a fallacy? Whatever will make you fuck off as it's pretty clear you don't actually want to argue the point or you would have kept doing it several posts ago instead of descending into "can't admit I might not have been 100% right" cheap argumentative bullshit which is all you're doing now.

Even if I'm abusing and insulting and a right fucking twat I'm not wrong mate. Your "clear evidence to the contrary" is anything but and you're absolutely delusional if you think you've provided clear evidence she is at legal risk based on this post alone. Mate, it's fine to just admit you were being overly rigid and it's very fucking clear that in the real world the obvious joke nature of this post would be the first thing considered and first reason why it would never make it as far as legal trouble. If you genuinely can't see even some truth in that then I think you need to get your programming checked as it's not factoring in some important things. I suspect you can actually see that side of my argument though which is why you keep avoiding actually arguing that point and evade to whatever other nonsense instead. As I'm sure you'll do in your next reply again. I wonder what argumentative tactic can't ever lose an argument online bullshit you'll hit out with next. Actually I don't, I hope you won't bother.