| Comment | Hi there, I'm being vague more because it's a very niche issue that would maybe give away the flat.
The work carried out is known to everyone as I'd spoken with other flats while it was being carried out. It was also being carried out within the one flat, which the invoice confirms.
In order to find the damage, they had to rip away much of the flat, however, as soon as they found it they then billed flat owner for the repair.
My point is that the issue itself was very clearly a private issue from the beginning. The thing that was damage was owned by the tennant, and there is only one in the building (being the one they own).
To call the factor and say we have a problem with x in our "building" feels misleading to me. They must have known it was their issue from the beginning, and yet by highlighting it as a building issue they have been able to push the cost of inspection to everyone else, which was the most expensive bit. |
|---|