| Comment | Its a bit of a leap to say comparing 3 incidents compared to 100 is irrelevant on the grounds of whataboutism.
Though the information's probably out there for trends in these incidents within Glasgow over the past few decades - which if any of the opposition here to the Council have their act together, aught to be able to present as part of their argument (besides yes, presenting other City's data over the same period).
Otherwise yes, 3 does sound like a small number in the scheme of things and not something I'd be concerned about until it was presented that there's some larger issue involved that isn't societal in all the areas effected and not just a lack of funding. Till then, rats are something you'd expect in most major Cities, and I'd expect at least similar numbers of incidents elsewhere as in Glasgow. |
|---|