| Comment | Released after a successful appeal
>Lord Turnbull wrote: “It does not seem to us that a polite conversational request or complement can be construed as threatening merely because it is uninvited or unwelcome. “There was nothing in the appellant’s behaviour as spoken to by the complainers in charges 5, 6 and 18 which was overtly threatening or which could reasonably be construed as threatening.
Apparently, the only charge that could have stuck was the abusive text message(s) he sent. |
|---|