| Comment | The material item is irrelevant.
What this person is suggesting is legislating against something perfectly legal, and taking it by force from the owner, and not only that, giving it to someone else. This is a very dangerous prescident to suggest. It’s also incredibly wishful thinking and comes across as quite entitled to me. They literally said ‘and give them to people that have nothing’. Why do you think you deserve something for nothing?
I suspect these people might have a different perspective if the shoe were on the other foot, which makes the whole thing seem very hypocritical to me. |
|---|