Title | |
---|---|
Author | Sanuuu |
Comment | Don't take me wrong, I'm well aware that there is nothing at *the same speed and price*, but the difference between flying and the train is not actually as huge as most people believe. I'm kinda tired of a lot of folk just taking flying as the default not even considering the alternatives. Like, looking at the actual numbers - if you include getting from and to the airport then you get 15min to GLA + 1h being there before flight + 1h15min flight + 50min STN to central London -> that's 3h20min versus the train taking only one hour(ish) longer at 4h30min. Cost wise, £8 to get to GLA + ~£30 for the flight + £20 for train from STN = £58. That's versus £60 train tickets (for next week, not necessarily for months in advance). I've had times when I managed to go by train for even as low as ~£25 with the railcard and ticket splitting. I'm not anti-flying as I fly quite regularly across Europe to see family, but I do believe that each journey should be looked as on a case by case basis, and in case of domestic travel I think it almost never makes sense, given the environmental cost. I even took a train all the way to Poland a couple times because cost wise it becomes quite similar to the cost of flying during Christmas price surges. |
Reddit Link | https://www.reddit.com/r/glasgow/comments/umbqhu/glasgow_airport/i811pwe/ |
Created | Tue 10th May 2022 9:50am |
Status | normal () |