| Comment | Of course it is, but it isn't inherently indicative of a sense of superiority or even hatred, its just cunty. Misogyny should be identified by a pattern of behaviours, not a single comment tbh unless that comment is explicitly undoubtedly ridiculous, like the kind of stuff you would find among incels or MRAs where there is no shadow of a doubt.
>Do you think it’s a positive thing to call a person a dog?
I think it's valid to call awful people dogs, but then that would be insulting to dogs. Otherwise it's just cunty. But the context is important, and in this context we can only presume it was a sardonic remark. |
|---|