| Comment | The place needs redeveloped, it's a decaying eyesore.
I am opposed to the current proposed design as whilst it is better, it's also an eyesore IMHO. There is the chance to build something great and they've gone with _that_ generic pish. Not to mention the height.
25% social housing sounds OK to me, not opposed to that at all.
> Not entirely sure what I'm suggesting here
Now I begin to understand what happened at the meeting. |
|---|