| Comment | Reading through the results, there seems to be a clear north-south bias to 'greenness' that is out of keeping with anecdotal knowledge (Sheffield being a key example)
This combined with the lack of validation of their method, suggests that maybe the methodology for detecting vegetation is flawed and works better in the South of the UK than the North (i.e. where vegetation is 'greener')
If I were a reviewer, this would be getting a clear 'major revision needed' flag |
|---|