| Comment | OP, you are missing a crucial part to the story - the site was not secure. If this happened repeatedly, as you have stated, then questions need to be asked of the Contractors how and why they managed to get in the site.
I have worked in construction for decades now and have worked on many urban sites in areas with equal reputation. Without fail, if there was a breach of the site by an unauthorised person(s) then the Contractor would be answerable as they have taken ownership of the site and their insurances would need to take account of said breach. They may provide additional deterrents, more secure hoarding, CCTV, dogs, security daleks etc. But in this case, from what you are saying, this did not happen. Why not? That is the question that should be asked, not some victim blaming pish because you did not like the brats. |
|---|