Definitely feels like a slippery slope though.
The original 'belief' laws were meant to protect religious belief and prevent punishment due to political opinions in an era where those tended to range between two to a degree different paths toward the eventual same end goal.
It feels like perverting the spirit of the law (obv not venues' fault) to reinterpret 'belief' as 'anything whatsoever that any person thinks even if that thought contravenes other existing laws'. |