r/Glasgow Tools

Next time try to write your answer without attempts to offend the adversary, as not only you risk not getting an answer but you also come out as utter bawbag.

Now, I let it slip this time so:


\- yes, the soldiers dying is the occupational risk. The very definition of being a soldier is to risk one's life to protect civilians.


\- yes, the problem that yours (and also mine, but mostly American) army does not give a fuck who they are bombing is one of the major reasons why the Middle East is in such a mess right now.


\- nobody sane would want to risk and bomb their own people. Civilised people would also not want to bomb other civilians. Barbarians - like Hamas or IDF do.


\- so far it's the Israel - who has the bigger gun - that is doing most of "shooting at the people they want to be erradicated from the earth".


\- yes, if Israel wanted, they could wipe Palestine off the face of the planet in the afternoon. But they know that would make everyone else angry, so they are doing it by small steps. The most recent example of genocide in Palestine, and the reaction of many countries - suggest that this time they might have cut too thick slice of the salami, to use the popular alegory.

​

\- no, Hamas would not show such restraint. Fortunately for everyone, Hamas has no means to cause damage of a such scale. Israel, however, does. And, unlike Hamas, Israel claims to be a democratic, law observing, humanitarian country. Unfortunately for everyone - but mostly for its Palestinian victims - the action of Israel prove that they are not that different from hamas as they would like us to believe.