| Comment | I mean it would be a shite comparison if the original timeline of the new trains was meant to be 7 years, but it was meant to be less than half that. So it's just meant to illustrate the ridiculousness of the magnitude of the delay.
If anything, we've got faster at infrastructure projects since the 19th centrury thanks to mechanisation.
If you want a more like-for-like comparison, see my comment above re: the newcastle metro |
|---|