r/Glasgow Tools

R4ndyR4ndom

Reddit URLhttps://www.reddit.com/user/R4ndyR4ndom
Last 12 monthsTotalDeletedRemoved
r/Glasgow posts100
r/glasgow comments1500

Interests:

  • Oops by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:38am)
  • Not get rid of, just get it out of the city center, or something like that. See what the options are. by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:43am)
  • Well, Facebook, what were you expecting? by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:42am)
  • How about making it perfect? by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:40am)
  • I think the petitions goal is to see what options there are, so that they can answer your question. by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:40am)
  • I think the petitions goal is to see what options there are, so that they can answer your question. by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:39am)
  • For instance by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:45am)
  • No harm trying though by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:45am)
  • Who knows what great ideas may come from his petition, I think it's worth at least re-evaluating the situation, so I signed it. by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:45am)
  • Background information It is not clear whether the commitment to ongoing maintenance of the elevated M8 has been evaluated in light of the new cooperation agreement between the SNP and Green Party which states "we will not build road infrastructure to cater for unconstrained increases in traffic". It is not clear if full removal of the central section has been considered by Glasgow Council or Scottish Government or Scottish Highways as a way of addressing GCC's Regeneration Framework Objectives which states: - Reinforce the city centre's economic competitiveness; - Re-populate the city centre; - Reconnect the City centre with surrounding communities and its riverside; - Reduce traffic dominance and car dependency; - Green the city centre and make it climate resilient; - Repair, restore and enhance the urban fabric. Evidence is plentiful showing removal of similar roads around the world does not have anticipated negative impacts and brings economic, social and environmental benefits (https://www.cnu.org/our-projects/highways-boulevards) by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 10:58am)
  • And it could work better, why not investigate what the options are.. by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 11:08am)
  • I can fully imagine that being the level of commenting on fb though by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 11:07am)
  • That's the government saying all those things! At least let them also look at these option before making decisions... by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 11:05am)
  • Background information (copied from petition) It is not clear whether the commitment to ongoing maintenance of the elevated M8 has been evaluated in light of the new cooperation agreement between the SNP and Green Party which states "we will not build road infrastructure to cater for unconstrained increases in traffic". It is not clear if full removal of the central section has been considered by Glasgow Council or Scottish Government or Scottish Highways as a way of addressing GCC's Regeneration Framework Objectives which states: - Reinforce the city centre's economic competitiveness; - Re-populate the city centre; - Reconnect the City centre with surrounding communities and its riverside; - Reduce traffic dominance and car dependency; - Green the city centre and make it climate resilient; - Repair, restore and enhance the urban fabric. Evidence is plentiful showing removal of similar roads around the world does not have anticipated negative impacts and brings economic, social and environmental benefits (https://www.cnu.org/our-projects/highways-boulevards) by R4ndyR4ndom (Tue 12th Oct 2021 11:10am)
  • Or excellent time, yes by R4ndyR4ndom (Sun 31st Oct 2021 1:28pm)